Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 29, 2019. It is now read-only.

Talk length not stated on call for proposals page #84

Closed
emmagordon opened this issue May 8, 2016 · 5 comments
Closed

Talk length not stated on call for proposals page #84

emmagordon opened this issue May 8, 2016 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@emmagordon
Copy link
Contributor

This would be really useful information for people contemplating possible talk proposals, as it helps guide topic choice/scope etc.

@Lukasa
Copy link
Member

Lukasa commented May 9, 2016

Yup, we 100% need this. We actually need better guidance than that: your slot will be x minutes long, but you need to leave 5 minutes for handover, so your actual presentation slot will be y minutes long, so if you want to do questions you'll only be able to present for z minutes.

@evildmp
Copy link
Member

evildmp commented May 11, 2016

@Lukasa @inglesp In that case I would like to revive the question I raised some weeks ago: how will we shape our talks days?

It's impossible to stipulate lengths of talks precisely without having made a decision on this.

I propose to use http://conference-handbook.readthedocs.io/talks/timetable.html#plan-three-long-and-short-talks as the basis for Friday to Sunday, and http://conference-handbook.readthedocs.io/talks/timetable.html#plan-two-20-minute-slots as the basis for Thursday.

@Lukasa
Copy link
Member

Lukasa commented May 11, 2016

@evildmp Sounds reasonable to me.

@inglesp
Copy link
Contributor

inglesp commented May 12, 2016

I've created PyconUK/documentation#92 to track putting the skeleton schedule together.

@evildmp: In the interim, could we add something to the CFP about talks being between twenty and forty minutes in length, and something about working with selected speakers to ensure that the scope of their talk matches the amount of time we allocate to them?

@Lukasa: Good point about whether length of talks includes questions. See PyconUK/documentation#93 -- and feel free to add you own notes to this.

@emmagordon: Thanks for raising this -- and please do submit proposals to the CFP!

@inglesp
Copy link
Contributor

inglesp commented Jul 11, 2016

This is now moot as the CFP has closed. Closing.

@inglesp inglesp closed this as completed Jul 11, 2016
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants