Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a redirect on https://pysces.sourceforge.net #2

Open
jmrohwer opened this issue May 4, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

Add a redirect on https://pysces.sourceforge.net #2

jmrohwer opened this issue May 4, 2024 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@jmrohwer
Copy link
Member

jmrohwer commented May 4, 2024

Currently the PySCeS website is available from two places, https://pysces.github.io and https://pysces.sourceforge.net

Apart from creating extra maintenance burden, these sites are now out of sync with the release of 1.2.0, and I don't have access rights to update the Sourceforge site.

It would be better just to display a simple message on the Sourceforge site that the new website is now at https://pysces.github.io and include a clickable link. Alternatively a redirect (but I'm not sure if this is possible on the Sourceforge site).

Triggered by this discussion.

@bgoli
Copy link
Member

bgoli commented May 7, 2024

I've updated the Sourceforge site which is simply a copy of the GitHub pages so all links are the same. Redirecting is annoying and seeing as the SF site has a 20+ year legacy I'll keep it like it is - also not trust everything to Microsoft - and remember to update it when we make a release.

Something else I've just noticed is that the page does not reference the google group which I'll fix in my next updates.

@jmrohwer
Copy link
Member Author

PySCeS 1.2.1 is released. Github.io page has been updated. Sourceforge needs update.

@bgoli
Copy link
Member

bgoli commented May 11, 2024 via email

@jmrohwer
Copy link
Member Author

👍
Did you have to do the Zenodo manually? I checked very soon after the release and the new version was there. So it seems the GH trigger is finally working. Was something wrong/missing?

@bgoli
Copy link
Member

bgoli commented May 12, 2024 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants