You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you again for all the help in my previous issue. I am interested in examining if the TripL distance between two trees is significantly different from a set of random trees. I was using the rmtree() function in ape() R package to generate random trees, and was wondering if the current way of using TripL() is correct? Any suggestions would be helpful!
code used-
Ptree1 <- read.tree("hosttree-treponemacog0016.nwk")
d<-data.frame(label=Ptree1$tip.label)
nRep=10
randomtrees<-rmtree(nRep, nrow(d), rooted = TRUE, tip.label = Ptree1$tip.label, br = runif) ##generate a random rooted tree with branch lengths
randomDists<-sapply(randomtrees,TripL,x=Ptree1)
##expectedCID <- mean(randomDists)
dist12 <- TripL(Ptree1, Ptree2) ##TripL on two original trees
##comparing the random and original tree distances
nThisSimilar <- sum(randomDists < dist12)
pValue <- nThisSimilar / nRep
What do you think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hey @ArtPoon lab
Thank you again for all the help in my previous issue. I am interested in examining if the TripL distance between two trees is significantly different from a set of random trees. I was using the
rmtree()
function inape()
R package to generate random trees, and was wondering if the current way of usingTripL()
is correct? Any suggestions would be helpful!code used-
What do you think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: