Include the Boostagram Specification in this Repository #506
Closed
Alwin-Stockinger
started this conversation in
Enhancement Proposal
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
Yes, please do this. As soon as you do it I will propose the return address as a PR on this repo instead. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Sender key sounds sounds a lot like what @daveajones is proposing (just an observed bonus) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I think the specification for Boostagrams should be moved to the podcast-namespace repository (instead of being managed in https://github.com/lightning/blips/blob/master/blip-0010.md). Discussions on enhancing or relating to it are already taking place in this repository, see for example:
Blip 10 (the current specification) suffers from duplicate fields (for example
time
andts
) and loosely explained fields such asuuid
. I think iterating and improving the spec would be easier if Boostagrams would be defined in this repository.There are also some (to my knowledge) unused fields such as
signature
andsender_key
which could be removed if deemed unnecessary or reintroduced with a useful purpose.If there is support for this I will make a Pull Request that includes the spec in this repository.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions