Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[REQUEST] The possiblity to see how the subboard was won #16

Open
Nircek opened this issue Mar 31, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

[REQUEST] The possiblity to see how the subboard was won #16

Nircek opened this issue Mar 31, 2020 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Nircek
Copy link
Member

Nircek commented Mar 31, 2020

** Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. **
I'm always frustrated when I'm waiting for my opponent's move and then ... the subboard is won. And I don't know how was it possible. I guess my rival wasn't cheating but I have no idea how he won that part.

** Describe the solution you'd like **
I'm convinced the possibility to uncover the subboard after a click on it would be a very nice-looking and educative choice. And of course, after another click, the big winning mark should appear again. So the click on the won subboard would switch the viewing. One is a big won subboard (default) and another is how was it won.

** Describe alternatives you've considered **
There can be also some... gray or shaded uncovered subboard on the winning mark. Or the animation of striking out the three in a row. But I think the cover/uncover method is the most modern way and fits the app's design.

** Additional context **
Please consider the last move's mark.

@Nircek Nircek added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 31, 2020
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to To do (Features) in General project Mar 31, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
General project
  
To do (Features)
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants