-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Heap clone refactoring / cleanup #247
Conversation
0a7ec76
to
9405aaa
Compare
src/storage/read_stream.h
Outdated
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ | |||
/*------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does this have to be here? Looks like a dup of include/storage/read_stream.h
src/include/storage/read_stream.h
Outdated
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ | |||
/*------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't see any usage of this header file anywhere in the code. Is this something for the future?
This commit just removed old no longer needed comments, and fixes a few inconsistent naming issues so the diff between upstream and our code is minimal (after running the sed script to process upstream code)
Recent commits in the PG17 code added additional API changes, making the "single src directory with ifdefs" approach inpractical. This commit adds a new python based script (documented with comments in the file) to help with version specific merges, where the copied heap files reside in srcXX directories, where XX is the version.
This pull requests adds a new helper script, and moves our modified heap AM from the "src" to the "src16" directory.
It also contains more cleanup (removal of old no longer needed comments/changes, and fixing of a missing previous heap commit).
As these are multiple, but related changes the pull request contains multiple commits. Instead of reviewing it all together please review the individual commit messages and review the commits one by one, as that makes more sense in this case, but I don't one to split it into even more pull requests.