Human-Seeded Tag

[Cyber-Dani]

As we continue to evolve the schema, it's essential we strike the right balance between comprehensiveness and ease of use.

We need to work to adapt ArtiFact to better reflect the diverse ways in which AI can contribute to the creative process.

One potential enhancement to consider is the introduction of a new "Human-Seeded" tag.

This would apply to content where the initial ideas or key points are provided by a human, and then an AI system develops and expands upon these to generate the final piece of content.

This tag may offer a more nuanced understanding of the human-AI collaboration, giving credit to both human creativity and AI's generative capabilities, however, we need to understand whether it overlaps with the Machine-Assisted content, which at the moments works like: "Yes, the AI helped me making this content, but let me define exactly how".

However, as always, we want to make sure that any changes to our schema are beneficial and intuitive for all users.

Therefore, I'm reaching out for external thoughts on the following questions:

• Do you see a need for a "Human-Seeded" tag in the schema?
• How do you perceive the potential value and implications of such a tag?
• Would the addition of this tag affect the ease of use of our schema?
• Do you have any other suggestions for how we can improve our schema's comprehensiveness while maintaining its user-friendliness?

I highly value community insights and experiences, and I look forward to hearing thoughts on these matters.

-Delta