Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Otio reader app: Start timecode / playhead timer obscured by track header column #25

Open
TrevorAyl opened this issue Nov 4, 2024 · 6 comments

Comments

@TrevorAyl
Copy link

TrevorAyl commented Nov 4, 2024

As shown in attached screen grab.

Screenshot 2024-11-04 at 14 18 41

NB 'Untitled Timeline' = Resolve not adding the timeline name to the otio currently.

@vade
Copy link
Contributor

vade commented Nov 7, 2024

Interesting. Can you attach a sample OTIO file? Perhaps resolve is adding the timeline name somewhere im not checking? Thanks!

@TrevorAyl
Copy link
Author

Archive.zip
Here's a couple.

@vade
Copy link
Contributor

vade commented Nov 7, 2024

Interesting.

In the file format there is no name provided:

"name": "",

In your Resolve Timeline, does it have a name? if so, is it the same as the file name? Would the preferred behavior here be to use the file name if the name is empty?

@TrevorAyl
Copy link
Author

I don't think it's possible not to have a timeline name in Resolve - I guess they haven't coded that in their otio export. I think the best option is to maybe leave it untitled - indicate that there is an issue with the otio export.

@vade
Copy link
Contributor

vade commented Nov 7, 2024

Ill see who to contact at Blackmagic Design - that smells like a minor oversight on their end.

@TrevorAyl
Copy link
Author

Although the untitled timeline was a side issue - main issue is only in thread title and not very clear from the screen grab.

Namely that the playhead time code is obscured at the start (should be 01:00:00:00).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants