-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 452
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
One small problem #2302
Comments
Dear @sffgd, The position of the blades is defined by the rotor azimuth angle, which is an output of ElastoDyn ( Best regards, |
Dear @jjonkman, Thank you for your reply!According to your reply, I have identified the position and azimuth of the 3 blades on the diagram, is this correct? Best regards, |
Dear @sffgd, Well, you haven't stated if your diagram is from an observer who is upwind looking downwind (with clockwise rotation) or from an observer who is downwind looking upwind (with counterclockwise rotation). Given your azimuth labeling, it looks like you are showing clockwise rotation (so the observer is upwind looking downwind), but in this case, you've swapped the labeling of blades 2 and 3. Best regards, |
Dear @jjonkman, |
Dear @sffgd, Yes, your updated image is now consistent with an ElastoDyn model defined with Best regards, |
Dear @jjonkman, |
Hello everyone,
When I process openfast output data, for example: RootMxb1, RootMxb2, RootMxb3.I know that this is the root moment representing the 3 blades, but I don't know the position of the blades corresponding to RootMxb1, RootMxb2, and RootMxb3.
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: