You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
IMHO, the checkbox "Enable unsafe levels" on the Get Started page is misleading, because it is effective for the buttons on this page only.
If you (like I did) first close all modules and then open single categories in OpenFloor mode, then e.g. for the category "Injection" also the unsafe XXE modules are opened without being warned. Not knowing how the lessons/challenges are implemented (simulation or for real), it is impossible to estimate if they are safe or not.
Therefore my suggestions :
the decision about unsafe modules should be memorized in table core.settings
the checkbox should also be present on pages Open/Close Modules and Open/Close Categories; depending on it unsafe modules could be listed or not (in case of Open/Close Modules) or not opened (in case of Open/Close Categories).
unsafe modules in module listings could be marked with a star at the end of their names
BTW: there's a Discussions tab here in GitHub. I wanted to present these considerations there first, but it seems the discussion section is not (yet) used in this project.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
IMHO, the checkbox "Enable unsafe levels" on the
Get Started
page is misleading, because it is effective for the buttons on this page only.If you (like I did) first close all modules and then open single categories in
OpenFloor
mode, then e.g. for the category "Injection" also the unsafe XXE modules are opened without being warned. Not knowing how the lessons/challenges are implemented (simulation or for real), it is impossible to estimate if they are safe or not.Therefore my suggestions :
core.settings
Open/Close Modules
andOpen/Close Categories
; depending on it unsafe modules could be listed or not (in case ofOpen/Close Modules
) or not opened (in case ofOpen/Close Categories
).BTW: there's a Discussions tab here in GitHub. I wanted to present these considerations there first, but it seems the discussion section is not (yet) used in this project.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: