Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Hagar #39

Open
tijptjik opened this issue May 26, 2014 · 5 comments
Open

Hagar #39

tijptjik opened this issue May 26, 2014 · 5 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@tijptjik
Copy link

No description provided.

@tijptjik tijptjik added this to the week-3 milestone May 26, 2014
@code-by-mandy
Copy link

Their data would be on Cambodia Vietnam and Afghanistan - on HK they are
funds and awareness raising
On May 26, 2014 5:03 PM, "Mart van de Ven" [email protected] wrote:


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/39
.

@tijptjik
Copy link
Author

True thing - but even the funding aspects could be of interest to us. They
could publish data on how many people request their help, and how often
they have to turn them down because there isn't enough funding for it.

I agree the value prop for HK isn't as clear, but it wouldn't hurt us :)

Cheers,

Mart

On 27 May 2014 12:09, muddaymoos [email protected] wrote:

Their data would be on Cambodia Vietnam and Afghanistan - on HK they are
funds and awareness raising
On May 26, 2014 5:03 PM, "Mart van de Ven" [email protected]
wrote:


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<
https://github.com/ODHK/ckan/issues/39>
.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/39#issuecomment-44234251
.

@code-by-mandy
Copy link

Ah ok so potentially use to articulate value of funding chapter in hk?

On Tuesday, May 27, 2014, Mart van de Ven [email protected] wrote:

True thing - but even the funding aspects could be of interest to us. They
could publish data on how many people request their help, and how often
they have to turn them down because there isn't enough funding for it.

I agree the value prop for HK isn't as clear, but it wouldn't hurt us :)

Cheers,

Mart

On 27 May 2014 12:09, muddaymoos <[email protected]javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>
wrote:

Their data would be on Cambodia Vietnam and Afghanistan - on HK they are
funds and awareness raising
On May 26, 2014 5:03 PM, "Mart van de Ven" <[email protected]javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>

wrote:


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<
https://github.com/ODHK/ckan/issues/39>
.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<
https://github.com/ODHK/ckan/issues/39#issuecomment-44234251>
.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/39#issuecomment-44252909
.

@tijptjik
Copy link
Author

Well - I could imagine that if someone were interesting in figuring out
what charity fundraising in Hong Kong is like. That kind of data would be
valuable. E.g. if you wanted to do 'market' research into charity funding
in Hong Kong to figure out what kind of charities raise what kind of money,
and whether they ultimately meet their funding goals. That insight would be
invaluable to charities and would rely on dozens of charity funding
datasets to be combined. It's actually relatively straight-forward since
most charities want to be transparent about their funding, so it would be a
good start! :)

@code-by-mandy
Copy link

Ah I see!!!

On Tuesday, May 27, 2014, Mart van de Ven [email protected] wrote:

Well - I could imagine that if someone were interesting in figuring out
what charity fundraising in Hong Kong is like. That kind of data would be
valuable. E.g. if you wanted to do 'market' research into charity funding
in Hong Kong to figure out what kind of charities raise what kind of money,
and whether they ultimately meet their funding goals. That insight would be
invaluable to charities and would rely on dozens of charity funding
datasets to be combined. It's actually relatively straight-forward since
most charities want to be transparent about their funding, so it would be a
good start! :)


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/39#issuecomment-44254858
.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants