You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While removing the legacy frontend, I ran our non regression test suite with the SAT solver Tableaux. I caught a bug. This test failed:
(set-logic ALL)
(declare-fun P (Int) Bool)
(declare-fun f (Int) Int)
; This quantifier is explicitly annotated with a (f x) trigger.
; It should not cause this problem to be unsat.
(assert
(forall ((x Int))
(! (not (P x)) :pattern ((f x)))))
; Note that we don't use (f 0).
(assert (P 0))
(check-sat)
We got unsat even if we should not because the trigger prevents us from instantiating the axiom. It seems that the fix in #1051 have not been tested with Tableaux.
Notice that the bug affects Tableaux-CDCL too.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I don't think this is related to Dolmen -- this file is also proved by the legacy frontend. This seems to be due to the Backward instantiation pass which seems to always compute triggers (ignoring matching) and instantiate all lemmas that can prove things from (P e1 .. en) whenever (P e1 .. en) is in the context.
While removing the legacy frontend, I ran our non regression test suite with the SAT solver
Tableaux
. I caught a bug. This test failed:We got
unsat
even if we should not because the trigger prevents us from instantiating the axiom. It seems that the fix in #1051 have not been tested withTableaux
.Notice that the bug affects
Tableaux-CDCL
too.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: