Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

API filter #4

Open
bsumirak opened this issue Jun 10, 2015 · 3 comments
Open

API filter #4

bsumirak opened this issue Jun 10, 2015 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement
Milestone
v0.1

Comments

@bsumirak
Copy link
Member

Think about using an intermediary level for the UG API which is supposed to

  • be more stable in terms of developmental changes
  • hide UG API functionality that is not explicitly needed in the NeuroBox (and only makes it hard to find the essential class methods in an object's representation's drop-down menu)
@bsumirak bsumirak added this to the v0.1 milestone Jun 10, 2015
@stephanmg stephanmg added ready and removed ready labels Jun 18, 2015
@stephanmg
Copy link
Member

You could implement VFilter interface for your ComponentFilter in VRL, which could be applied within the NeuroBox configurator as dicussed previously.

@bsumirak
Copy link
Member Author

The VRL-UG-API-NeuroBox (or whatever we call it) plugin configurator would perhaps be a more suitable choice (depending on what we are going to filter, of course).

@stephanmg
Copy link
Member

Sounds also quite reasonable.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v0.1
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@stephanmg @bsumirak