-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use more specific CreativeWork types #15
Labels
Milestone
Comments
For instances, this could be based on the RDA carrier categories. Here is the current breakdown:
(we can see some errors in the long tail) |
To start, we should avoid asserting schema:Book for non-books. |
osma
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 23, 2017
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Currently all schema.org bibliographic entities are typed as
schema:CreativeWork
and instance level entities also asschema:Book
. The latter is wrong in some cases. We should use the correct, more specific schema.org CreativeWork subtypes.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: