Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEA] Consider custom reduction if using non-contiguous stride #581

Closed
cliffburdick opened this issue Feb 29, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

Comments

@cliffburdick
Copy link
Collaborator

CUB does not have the ability to optimize a reduction with a non-contiguous stride, and instead relies on iterators for this. We still have custom reduction code that may be faster than CUB in this case. Investigating switching to that code if we detect this case.

@cliffburdick
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Duplicate of #482

@cliffburdick cliffburdick marked this as a duplicate of #482 Jul 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant