Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PRM: gracefully handle Service Hot Water Loops #96

Open
jmarrec opened this issue Jul 22, 2016 · 2 comments
Open

PRM: gracefully handle Service Hot Water Loops #96

jmarrec opened this issue Jul 22, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@jmarrec
Copy link
Collaborator

jmarrec commented Jul 22, 2016

This is potentially going to be tricky, but we have to find a way to gracefully handle Service Hot Water Loops.

Right now the current logic is:

Couple of Notes:

  • The WaterHeater fuel type is one thing, but there's a ton more to do, per G3.1.11 (especially b. and e.)
  • eg G3.1.11.e: if a "Where a combined system has been specified to meet both space heating and
    service water heating loads, the baseline building system shall use separate systems meeting the minimum efficiency requirements applicable to each system individually.". This is quite common in my experience to have a space heating boiler serve a storage tank through an internal or external HX. In the baseline I'd model a WaterHeater:Mixed with a minimum efficiency requirement (typically 80%), having the same storage capacity as the proposed design, and a burner heating capacity similar to the proposed system (this is tricky, the space heating boiler really is sized for the space heating load + DHW. I know some reviewers that force you to use the proposed space heating boiler capacity in the baseline waterheater, which to me is completely ridiculous, but I digress).
  • I just ran the PRM on a model that had a Service Water Heating loop with a single branch on the supply consisting of a FluidToFluid:HX and a WaterHeater:Mixed used as a storage tank only (no burner capacity). The resulting thing is en E+ crash because the FluidToFluid:HX is no longer connected on the supply side. The waterheater:mixed still has zero burner capacity anyways.
  • G.3.11.b is especially fundamental too: in any case you should model the baseline per minimum efficiency requirements, and if proposed heating source is electricity, then electric resistance is used (particularly important in case proposed is a Heat pump water heater)

Suggestion:

I suggest trying to asses how the SHW load is being handled: what fuel type is used, and is this a combination of space heating and SHW. Find the storage capacity of any storage medium, and find the heating capacity of the equipment serving the SHW load.

Then probably delete everything on the supply side of the SHW loop(s), keeping only the SPM and the water use connections. Maybe want to keep the pump too.

What do you think folks?

jmarrec added a commit to jmarrec/openstudio-standards that referenced this issue Jul 22, 2016
… and Stratified) correctly by checking it it's a storage tank only, and whether it's connected on the source side to a plant loop (related NREL#96)
@MatthewSteen
Copy link
Member

MatthewSteen commented Jul 22, 2016

Somewhat related to NREL/EnergyPlus/issues/5613.

@mdahlhausen
Copy link
Collaborator

Mostly addressed in #1692; will close once that PR is merged.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants