Skip to content

Implement MAP-T? #193

@ydahhrk

Description

@ydahhrk

2018-11-25 Update

Hello. If you came here from the survey, I suppose you might want to know what MAP-T is.

Truth be told, I'm far from the best person to explain it. We used to have a summary of it in the documentation, but at some point something made me feel that it was incorrect, and so deleted it. Presently, my recollection of how it works is vague, and even then, still presumably incorrect.

If you can provide a good summary of what MAP-T is, please post it below.

For now, the best I can really do is provide a link to the RFC.

Progress: Coding is underway. See the mapt branch.

Original post

Branched off #175.

We now have a MAP-T summary and it seems to be screaming for MAP-T support.

Actually, this doesn't have much priority because there are other implementations. I just want options to assign to colleagues (and MAP-T might be better suited for newcomers than some of the other stuff).

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions