You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For the purposes of comparision to traditional methods, we wish to create a buchi-automata style checker. This is primarily for comparision with the checker developped in Issue26.
Spot provides some ltl-to-buchi translation mechanisms. The documentation for the command line tool is here
However, the automata it produces accept infinite words, while we deal with finite traces. Overall, their Buchi Automata (degeneralized) are more suited for our purposes that the transition-based-generalized ones. However these translations are not completely deterministic for more complex formulae.
It may also be useful for our purposes to append exclusion conditions (stemming from our atomic proposition == event convention, e.g. G!(a&b) represents the two events cannot be simulatenous), as this reduces the number of transitions in the automata.
[Issue created by carolemieux: 2014-08-20]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For the purposes of comparision to traditional methods, we wish to create a buchi-automata style checker. This is primarily for comparision with the checker developped in Issue26.
Spot provides some ltl-to-buchi translation mechanisms. The documentation for the command line tool is here
http://spot.lip6.fr/userdoc/ltl2tgba.html
And the online version of the tool is here
http://spot.lip6.fr/ltl2tgba.html
However, the automata it produces accept infinite words, while we deal with finite traces. Overall, their Buchi Automata (degeneralized) are more suited for our purposes that the transition-based-generalized ones. However these translations are not completely deterministic for more complex formulae.
It may also be useful for our purposes to append exclusion conditions (stemming from our atomic proposition == event convention, e.g. G!(a&b) represents the two events cannot be simulatenous), as this reduces the number of transitions in the automata.
[Issue created by carolemieux: 2014-08-20]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: