Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Using event sets to concisely represent multiple formula instances #77

Open
bestchai opened this issue May 26, 2020 · 0 comments
Open
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@bestchai
Copy link
Member

bestchai commented May 26, 2020

Given a set of formula instances like this:

  • G(a -> XF(b))
  • G(a -> XF(c))
  • G(d -> XF(b))
  • G(d -> XF(c))

We can more concisely represent this set as:

  • G({a,d} -> XF({b,c}))

This task involves designing and implementing the above process, in which sets of formula instances are coalesced using sets of event types, as a post-processing step (should only impact the output).

Note that this is trending towards an InvariMint-style representation in which variables in formulas may denote events (lowercase var names), or sets of events (upper-case var names): G(x -> XF(y)) versus G(X -> XF(Y))

[Issue created by bestchai: 2014-08-19]

@bestchai bestchai added the enhancement New feature or request label May 26, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant