You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardexpand all lines: opendcs-acquisition/Compared_to_Sundew.md
+5-4
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -66,11 +66,12 @@ So, about 10x less stuff to manage.
66
66
* Sarracenia provides much more built-in functionality, the only code here is to interface with OpenDCS
67
67
* The Sundew plugin had to implement AMQP, building messages manually, and various availability strategies with stuff being left around from previous attempts.
68
68
* In the Sarracenia plugin, availability is implemented with two lines of code in producing the query selection criteria instead of an array of scripts.
69
-
* Sundew's pxRouting table, which is also needed, was left out from the comparison (it's 104klines... would have dwarfed everything else.)
69
+
* Sundew's pxRouting table, which is also needed, was left out from the comparison (it's 104klines... would have dwarfed everything else, would have been 100:1 in that case.)
70
70
* the maintenance interventions in Sarracenia are straightforward, edit one file, and restart. in Sundew, one has to re-run a sort
71
-
of compiler to rebuild configurations as an intermediate step.
72
-
*in the Sundew version one must have one configuration per LRGS server, the Sarracenia plugin uses a single configuration to query all three with redundancy included.
71
+
of compiler to rebuild configurations as an intermediate step. The configuration files to manage are also larger.
72
+
*In the Sundew version, one has a configuration per LRGS server, the Sarracenia plugin uses a single configuration to query all three with redundancy included.
73
73
* The Sarracenia version sanity checks PDTs, noting the ones missing from the OpenDCS reference, for later resolution.
74
-
74
+
* the Sarracenia plugin includes "geometry" (GeoJSON compatible location data) and "datetime" (observation datetime) headers in the messages,
0 commit comments