You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for your great work! I have a question regarding model efficiency mentioned in your paper. In Table 5 of the MedSegDiff-V2 paper, it states that the model has 46M parameters, while MedSegDiff-V1 (v1) has 23M. However, when I inspect the .pt file from the sample code, I found that the model's weights contain around 129M parameters.
Could you please clarify how the parameter count in the paper was calculated? Is there a specific version of the model that corresponds to the 46M parameter count? Or are there any additional steps or modifications applied to the model that I should be aware of?
Thanks again for your great work and looking forward to your response!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for your great work! I have a question regarding model efficiency mentioned in your paper. In Table 5 of the MedSegDiff-V2 paper, it states that the model has 46M parameters, while MedSegDiff-V1 (v1) has 23M. However, when I inspect the .pt file from the sample code, I found that the model's weights contain around 129M parameters.
Could you please clarify how the parameter count in the paper was calculated? Is there a specific version of the model that corresponds to the 46M parameter count? Or are there any additional steps or modifications applied to the model that I should be aware of?
Thanks again for your great work and looking forward to your response!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: