Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EBML implementation failure for RAWCooked files #226

Open
privatezero opened this issue Apr 26, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

EBML implementation failure for RAWCooked files #226

privatezero opened this issue Apr 26, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@privatezero
Copy link

Hi,
Not sure if this is a RAWCooked issue or a Media Conch issue, but I am guessing that it is just something in MediaConch having problems rather than a true conformance failure caused by RAWCooked.

I have a set of FFV1/MKV files that were created by RAWCooked and contain the embedded reversibility metadata, and it appears that on some of them this data is causing MediaConch's EBML implementation checker to read them as non-compliant. I made some gists with the metadata output of MediaConch for one of the affected files:

@digitensions
Copy link

digitensions commented Apr 27, 2021

I've been encoding new files today with RAWcooked 21.01, running them through Mediaconch 18.03. I'm getting pass! statements for the filename.mkv, but then two fail! statements for attachments. I don't recall having failures for attachments before, which is why I wonder if this is related. Happy to supply additional data alongside @privatezero if you think it's useful. Or I can move this to another issue tracker if necessary.

Many thanks :)

@privatezero
Copy link
Author

Tested this in most recent version, and it seems that this can be closed! I do note that the GUI will display a separate line for the rawcooked reversibility data embedded in the MKV, but I assume this was intentional?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants