Description
Specification
With the usage of the LockBox
, we should be able to do deadlock detection. Right now we have a map in each DBTransaction
called locks
. This records the locks that each transaction holds.
We can have a global map of pending locks, that is keys that transactions want to lock.
When a transaction tries to lock any set of keys, it checks this global map to see if any of the other transactions want a lock on any of the keys that itself owns. It can do this by iterating over all the keys it already owns. Doing this every single time we acquire any kind of lock does seem kind of inefficient. As the number of locks grow for a given transaction, the longer it takes to check the locks it already holds is currently desired by others. One way to get around this is to only trigger deadlock detection after certain time passes, because most of the time there should not be any deadlocks.
If a lock request has a timeout, then it is exempt from the pending locks. This is up for debate, basically if a lock request has a timeout, then it will eventually timeout, so technically it won't deadlock.
Additional context
- DBTransaction with Pessimistic Locking & Optimistic Locking and Deadlock Detection #17
- Introduce Snapshot Isolation OCC to DBTransaction #19
Tasks
- Bring in the deadlock detection system from
Monitor.ts
injs-async-locks
- Integrate
Monitor
intoDBTransaction
, we can imagine thatDBTransaction
can extend theMonitor
, orMonitor
can be an encapsulated property. An encapsulated property is probably better. - Better error handling, when the
Monitor
throws an error due to deadlock, we can provide extra information about theDBTransaction
that is causing the error... it may require some level of tracking information in the pending locks, perhaps a backlink to the transaction object.