-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Workshop discussions 2024 #520
Comments
DISCUSSION OF NON-EQUILIBRIUM AND MAGNETIC PROPERTIES ON TUESDAY Non-equilibrium structures i.e. atomic potentials (a few equilibrium) (Eric) Recommendation: Make a group of interested participants, and github repository, link to trajectories, stability Discussion: Rickard: could store in trajectory endpoint (with just a single entry) To do: sub-sub group to consult trajectory working group whether a “trajectory” should be a “collection” of uncorrelated snapshots? Define a collection as a set of trajectories all used in training a given machine learning potentials Further discussion: trajectory now favored data structure, but its defnition need to be clear that can be unordered. Magnets: (Oskar) Properties per atom: DFT, was spin orbit coupling turned on? Recommendation: Make a group of interested participants, and github repository |
DISCUSSION OF NON-EQUILIBRIUM AND MAGNETIC PROPERTIES ON WEDNESDAY Create /properties endpoint that contains cheminfo may need aliases from e.g. optical band gap to electronic band gap then discuss electronic that could contain |
Following further discussion it was agreed that snapshots used for training ML potentials should be stored within a trajectory if they have the same composition, and collection for changing composition. The trajectories working group should include a statement about how trajectories do not have to be indexed by time-step, but could be any arbitrary index (e.g. random number seed or nested sampling progression), and properties working group should formulate a paragraph with best use cases. |
@gjc29 and I have shortlisted the following ("least controversial") properties from MPDS property list for inclusion into OPTIMADE: No category:
Electronic and electrical properties:
Optical properties:
|
discussion of properties led to that we should only include density (3D), electron density of states at Fermi level, and work function, and that these should be in name spaces(s) and not the core. If they cannot be defined/calculated they should be left null |
Here are the discussion topics suggested for this year's workshop. We will cycle through them throughout the week:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: