Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sensitivity Analysis #28

Open
dg46 opened this issue Jan 24, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Sensitivity Analysis #28

dg46 opened this issue Jan 24, 2022 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@dg46
Copy link
Collaborator

dg46 commented Jan 24, 2022

Currently we only get point estimates of the causal effects, assuming that our causal graph is flawless. If the graph is wrong, we have no idea how bad our estimation results can get.

It would lend additional credibility to our analyses if we could specify multiple possible graphs (e.g. because we are not sure about the presence of one edge), estimate the causal effects based on each of the graphs and return something like a confidence interval instead of the current point estimates. A visual representation could be added to the automated pdf report.

I already have implemented a prototypical solution, just need to refactor and integrate it properly.

@dg46 dg46 added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 24, 2022
@dg46 dg46 self-assigned this Jan 24, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant