Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Suggestion] Have an error for the !?hjt scanner that says "This is NOT a HiJackThis log" if it doesn't detect the word "HiJackThis" in the file #12

Open
Southpaw1496 opened this issue Aug 29, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@Southpaw1496
Copy link

Southpaw1496 commented Aug 29, 2020

If you didn't want to modify the current system you could simply have a flag that sys "This IS a HiJackThis log" but I think this system would be more elegant. Another idea is checking if its a fork log but that's not necessary.

@Southpaw1496 Southpaw1496 changed the title [Suggestion] Have an error for the !?hjt scanner that says "This is NOT a HiJackThis log" if it doesn [Suggestion] Have an error for the !?hjt scanner that says "This is NOT a HiJackThis log" if it doesn't detect the word "HiJackThis" in the file Aug 29, 2020
@urielsalis
Copy link
Contributor

sometimes users put more stuff inside the paste, this would detect it no matter what happens (and work on more paste services that add stuff in the middle of the text)

@Southpaw1496
Copy link
Author

It would just do what it currently does with the detector but with a NOT modifier added on, I don't see how this wouldn't work in situations where the current scanner would.

@urielsalis
Copy link
Contributor

I dont see the value on it honestly, what would we gain of it saying its not a hjt log but still showing data?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants