Replies: 1 comment
-
Yes, the implementation is tested against the test vectors from RFC3610, including that specific case: But even the following snippet gives the correct results:
because it prints:
So I can only assume that any of the values |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Have you tested the AES-CCM implementation against the test vectors in the https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3610? We are seeing some unexpected result.
For the vector below, the encrypted output is correct but the tag does not match the MAC
As specified above, the MAC should be "17 E8 D1 2C FD F9 26 E0", but PyCryptodome gives us "70 72 79 11 D2 20 3C 60".
We are invoking PyCryptodome using the following code:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions