You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There seem to be various techniques like Turan oracle which detects t-finality in lucky cases, sometimes requiring more (than the corresponding q of) validators and denser message DAG.
This compromises fault tolerance for liveness and requires stronger synchrony assumption but might be good in practice about computational complexity (compared to clique oracle) or time to detection (compared to k-level inspector).
(If an algorithm to find that a lower bound of a clique is >q need >q + α of validators, the fault tolerance for plausible liveness is reduced proportionally to α)
Ideas:
One of such ideas is Turan oracle with pre-processing.
E.g. First, remove all the validators who are not connected to more than q of validators (This needs O(n^2)) and if there remained more than q validators then apply the Turan theorem
There seem to be various techniques like Turan oracle which detects t-finality in lucky cases, sometimes requiring more (than the corresponding
q
of) validators and denser message DAG.This compromises fault tolerance for liveness and requires stronger synchrony assumption but might be good in practice about computational complexity (compared to clique oracle) or time to detection (compared to k-level inspector).
(If an algorithm to find that a lower bound of a clique is
>q
need>q + α
of validators, the fault tolerance for plausible liveness is reduced proportionally toα
)Ideas:
q
of validators (This needsO(n^2)
) and if there remained more thanq
validators then apply the Turan theoremThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: