Group Meeting Reminders v14+ Build and Bug fix #139
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…tually honoring no/false on the attribute.
guymaness2
approved these changes
Oct 17, 2023
nateh777
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 17, 2023
…r-14 Group Meeting Reminders v14+ Build and Bug fix (cherry picked from commit e51fc8e)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
What does the change add or fix?
Update version to rebuild for v14+ with new iCal reference and found a bug that it was not actually honoring no/false on the attribute.
Release Notes
What does the change add or fix in a succinct statement that will be read by clients?
Requested By
Who reported, requested, or paid for the change?
Warranty
Screenshots
Does this update or add options to the block UI?
No
Change Log
What files does it affect?
Migrations/External Impacts
Is it a breaking change for other versions/clients?
Yes, technically 14+ only will have the fix for the boolean "no/false" and has to have a specific dll build for version support.