You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be really good to have some sort of organization to the list of models. There is a tremendous variety of items there from test models to production-quality ones. This list is sufficiently long to (85 items, I think) that it is easy to miss the ones that should be seen. Several different orderings and information could be displayed, depending on the space and structure that is available.
in general I think the production-quality models should be listed first, perhaps in reverse chronological order; and the system test models last, probably in alphabetical order.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Given that we regularly add test models, the overhead of maintaining separate categories (in folder structure, configuration and UI) is not negligible.
It would be really good to have some sort of organization to the list of models. There is a tremendous variety of items there from test models to production-quality ones. This list is sufficiently long to (85 items, I think) that it is easy to miss the ones that should be seen. Several different orderings and information could be displayed, depending on the space and structure that is available.
in general I think the production-quality models should be listed first, perhaps in reverse chronological order; and the system test models last, probably in alphabetical order.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: