Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Executable tutorial submission #2686

Closed
wants to merge 24 commits into from
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions contributions/executable-tutorial/golman/README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -28,3 +28,7 @@ I asked TA about this briefly in a lab session (not previous, but one before tha
**Relevance**

Jupyter Notebook/Lab is often used for processing, preparing, and visualizing data, as well as subsequently training machine learning models. The process of deriving a model is often an iterative process to determine suitable model architectures and optimal hyperparameters. Models may furthermore require continuous altering after deployment as more data becomes available or use cases change. This process is presumably often done manually, particularly as data scientists and conventional developers may be different teams, but there are clear benefits in automating the process.

**Submission**

[Github repository](https://github.com/kthfre/dd2482-executable-tutorial)
24 changes: 24 additions & 0 deletions contributions/feedback/golman-cnra/README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
# Assignment Proposal

## Title

Feedback for the executable tutorial "Infrastructure as Code with Pulumi".

## Names and KTH ID

- Fredrik Gölman ([email protected])
- Chandni Narottambhai Rakhashiya ([email protected])

## Deadline

- Task 3

## Category

- Feedback

## Description

Feedback for [this executable tutorial](https://github.com/KTH/devops-course/tree/2024/contributions/executable-tutorial/mqnguyen) by [email protected].

I've received approval from the author to leave feedback on this assignment. Am I making the correct assumption that the deadline for such feedback would be "Task 3" + 48h?
Loading