Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How to ensure estimation signals phases are in common with referenced signal? #59

Open
DoraemonBo opened this issue Nov 12, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@DoraemonBo
Copy link

if estimation signals are opposite phase to reference signals, the si-snr still decrease. But for communication signals(such as QPSK、BPSK), the opposite phase causes the bit error rate almost 1. How to ensure the same phase between estimation signals and reference signals.

@JusperLee
Copy link
Owner

I understand your concern about the phase issue, especially in the communication domain where opposite phase signals can drastically affect the bit error rate (BER). One possible solution is to calculate the magnitude difference between the estimated and reference signals instead of directly comparing the waveforms. This approach ignores phase mismatches and focuses on the amplitude, which may help mitigate the issue for communication signals like QPSK or BPSK.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants