We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The tests assume that hash(:F) is the same value as hash(:F, UInt(0)). That has not been the case since Julia added an optimization for the former:
hash(:F)
hash(:F, UInt(0))
hash(x::Symbol) = objectid(x)
Since the generated code uses the latter, the tests that verify the generated hash code should also use the former for comparison.
(Please assign this to me, or let me know if there is a new home for this macro)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Tests are now passing.
Sorry, something went wrong.
gafter
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
The tests assume that
hash(:F)
is the same value ashash(:F, UInt(0))
. That has not been the case since Julia added an optimization for the former:Since the generated code uses the latter, the tests that verify the generated hash code should also use the former for comparison.
(Please assign this to me, or let me know if there is a new home for this macro)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: