Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for OSACA #10

Open
vchuravy opened this issue Nov 30, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

Add support for OSACA #10

vchuravy opened this issue Nov 30, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@vchuravy
Copy link
Member

I recently added minimal support for llvm-mca, but it would be great to additionally have support for osaca

@Seelengrab
Copy link
Collaborator

OSACA also seems to support comment markers like LLVM-MCA, so those could be "just used" instead of the LLVM-MCA markers if OSACA output is requested. Maybe an API like

analyze(osaca(), foobar, args)
analyze(llvmmca(), foobar, args)

for selecting which analysis to run would be good? I'd like to add support for this after #31 is solved, since that issue will probably affect OSACA the same way - it's not analyzer specific after all.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants