Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tag v1.0 #29

Open
dlfivefifty opened this issue Jan 10, 2023 · 5 comments
Open

Tag v1.0 #29

dlfivefifty opened this issue Jan 10, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@dlfivefifty
Copy link
Member

I noticed it's been 1.5 years since the last breaking change. Please let me know in the next week if you have a breaking change otherwise I'll tag v1.0.

@putianyi889
Copy link
Contributor

putianyi889 commented Mar 29, 2023

How about having Infinity{::Type} for all numeric types? It could help with type-stability, since manipulating infinite arrays atm can easily yield ℵ₀ from a concrete type.

Similar ideas:

@dlfivefifty
Copy link
Member Author

Won't work since we can't do

struct Infinity{T} <: T end

@putianyi889
Copy link
Contributor

putianyi889 commented Mar 29, 2023

We could let them be distinct types. The "eltype" can be passed during computing, without promoting everything to Integer or Real. This can also help unify names and rules regarding different infinities.

@dlfivefifty
Copy link
Member Author

But then we would still need other types that are <: the corresponding type so I'm not sure its worth adding.

@dlfivefifty
Copy link
Member Author

It's now been 4 years... probably next tag should just be v1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants