We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
weight=
in Python, this is called sample_weight https://xgboost.readthedocs.io/en/stable/python/python_api.html#xgboost.XGBRegressor.fit
sample_weight
looks like XGBoost.jl exposes it via: https://github.com/dmlc/XGBoost.jl/blob/08c38da58050ca2df29f0e5fdcc06ce21de1dcd8/src/dmatrix.jl#L56
Do we have access to this concept in this package?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think the right way to do this is to add
+ 229 MMI.supports_weights(::Type{<:XGBoostRegressor}) = true + 230 MMI.supports_weights(::Type{<:XGBoostClassifier}) = true 231
and then also add a 4th argument to:
MLJXGBoostInterface.jl/src/MLJXGBoostInterface.jl
Lines 163 to 166 in 402861a
?
Sorry, something went wrong.
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
in Python, this is called
sample_weight
https://xgboost.readthedocs.io/en/stable/python/python_api.html#xgboost.XGBRegressor.fitlooks like XGBoost.jl exposes it via: https://github.com/dmlc/XGBoost.jl/blob/08c38da58050ca2df29f0e5fdcc06ce21de1dcd8/src/dmatrix.jl#L56
Do we have access to this concept in this package?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: