Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

NA treatment, omissions, modeling #46

Open
Jean-Baptiste-Camps opened this issue May 22, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

NA treatment, omissions, modeling #46

Jean-Baptiste-Camps opened this issue May 22, 2018 · 1 comment
Labels
method

Comments

@Jean-Baptiste-Camps
Copy link
Owner

There is some thinking to be made towards the handling of NA, their recovering, and the way texts are encoded, to avoid confusion between NA and omission, and to avoid abusive recovering of isolated readings, that would transform the genealogy.
@Jean-Baptiste-Camps
Copy link
Owner Author

See in the test-PCC and test-PCC.Exploratory in comments, how D is handled in the second version of the tradition.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
method
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@Jean-Baptiste-Camps