You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Software: permissive licenses (MIT or BSD) if possible
Resources: CC-BY if possible.
"
There is an ongoing group-intern debate on whether source code (e.g., the JCoRe code we distribute via GitHub) must comply with the licenses of the employed libraries if those are not included in the distribution and instead only referenced as a maven dependency (that would mean that using the API in the source makes the the source a derivative) or the source code rather constitutes a work of its own and only building the project merges source and libraries (thus constituting a derivative).
"
Anyways, I would recommend setting the BSD-2 clause license now and a prominent note at the top of the REAMDE that third party libraries might have different licenses -- better: make a list of all the third-party dependencies and their licenses respectively.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As of Mar 24, 2017 our licensing policy for
"
There is an ongoing group-intern debate on whether source code (e.g., the JCoRe code we distribute via GitHub) must comply with the licenses of the employed libraries if those are not included in the distribution and instead only referenced as a maven dependency (that would mean that using the API in the source makes the the source a derivative) or the source code rather constitutes a work of its own and only building the project merges source and libraries (thus constituting a derivative).
"
Anyways, I would recommend setting the BSD-2 clause license now and a prominent note at the top of the REAMDE that third party libraries might have different licenses -- better: make a list of all the third-party dependencies and their licenses respectively.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: