Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Annotation properties used in SHACL files not present in the ontology #26

Open
gatemezing opened this issue Jul 24, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Comments

@gatemezing
Copy link
Collaborator

There are two annotation properties used in SHACL file, not present in the current version of the ontology. They are the following:

  • era:affectedClass
  • era:affectedProperty
    Any reason here? / cc @ednaru
@ocorcho
Copy link
Contributor

ocorcho commented Jul 24, 2024

Hi Ghis,

This is coming from the changes that we had to make in order to reduce the amount of shapes that were being used for valdation in partial RDF updates. This was a "quick hack", and that is the reason why they were annotation properties. I am still hesitant to include them formally in the ontology, even if being annotation properties, although I agree that for completeness they should be included.

@gatemezing
Copy link
Collaborator Author

gatemezing commented Jul 24, 2024

I do understand the need. Maybe we could have a generic approach to extend sh: ontology with a way to annotate piece of information as it is now in a small vocab and publish it in w3id.org/? that way it could be generic and reusable by other actors having the same issues.
In the current REC of SHACL, there is sh:shapesGraph to link to an entire shape graph with a data graph. But there is no fine grained element like specific property or class.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants