Dataset Summary: List multiple related publications

[amberleahey]

We have a request to be able to list multiple related publications (when available) in the main Dataset summary section.

The URL display limitations were also something we encountered when using this section, I've made a note there as well #2814

[pdurbin]

I know this isn't really a solution but I wanted to point out that in Dataverse 4.20, the "Related Publication" tooltip was updated to include "The full list of Related Publications will be displayed on the metadata tab." This was done in pull request #6585 for #6546.

[TaniaSchlatter]

Showing multiple related publications could be addressed with the planned accordion UI element:

[kbrueckmann]

Users of our repository at Heidelberg University recently stumbled across this, too. Are there any news regarding the ability to include a list of publications or the planned accordion feature in the summary? @qqmyers mentioned the single-entry-policy in #10263; that might be related.

[pdurbin]

@kbrueckmann @amberleahey and others, I just tried adding multiple publications to the new React UI ( https://github.com/IQSS/dataverse-frontend ) and I think it looks a little better:

From https://beta.dataverse.org/spa/datasets?persistentId=doi:10.5072/FK2/SMVWNZ

What do you think?

p.s. I did open an issue about that funny looking email 😅

• underscores are escaped strangely with backslashes and accumulate dataverse-frontend#577

[qqmyers]

FWIW:
v6.5 now includes the Relation Type, e.g. "Is Cited By" in the summary view.

If someone is interested in doing work on the current UI, it would probably not be too hard to add a button on the current UI to open the metadata tab (it's accessible by adding &selectTab=metadataMapTab to the URL), a bit harder to also scroll to the Related Pub part, and doing an accordion would be a lot more code.

W.r.t. the SPA view - it looks OK with just a few publications - not sure how many actually get used in practice, but having 10+ could push the license way down the page unless it gets folded up.

[kbrueckmann]

@pdurbin We're still using the "old" UI, but I think this would work very well. In practice we usually don't have more than 5 related publications, but others surely handle it differently; so I'd support qqmyers' idea of folding up more than x entries.