Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
124 lines (78 loc) · 4.65 KB

SurveyResponse.md

File metadata and controls

124 lines (78 loc) · 4.65 KB

Survey Report: HashCode - Competitive Coding Platform Feedback

Introduction

This survey was conducted to gather feedback on the usability, features, and overall experience of a competitive programming platform. It aimed to understand user preferences, expectations, and areas for improvement. The survey targeted both participants and organizations interested in hosting contests on the platform.

Google Form Link

Google Form Link

Response Data

Google Spreadsheet of Responses


Survey Details

  • Total Participants: 130
  • Survey Duration: 1 day
  • Platform Used: Google Forms
  • Key Focus Areas:
    • Performance and uptime during contests
    • Willingness to participate in paid contests
    • Pricing preferences
    • Interest in hosting competitions
    • Features for tracking progression

Data Analysis

BASIC OVERVIEW

803789b7-a626-4c72-bbd8-ff1a1833639c 4e95c23c-46e3-4db5-b498-117a3096049e c68d404e-fa24-48bb-8aee-cdd488f376fc 97aa1bb3-87d5-47d8-8d04-f62058ebfb1a

1. How important is the performance and uptime of the platform during contests?

image

Key Insights:

  • Majority of users emphasized that performance and uptime are critical for a seamless contest experience.
  • Any downtime or performance issues may significantly affect user trust and participation.

2. Would you be willing to participate in paid contests?

image

Key Insights:

  • A considerable percentage of users expressed interest in paid contests.
  • This indicates potential for monetization through premium features or events.

3. How much would you be willing to pay for a high-quality competitive programming contest? (in rupees)

image

Key Insights:

  • Responses indicate a range of willingness to pay, suggesting a tiered pricing model might be effective.

4. As a company, would you be interested in hosting competitions on the platform?

image

Key Insights:

  • Companies showed moderate interest in hosting competitions, indicating a need to highlight the platform's benefits to organizations.

5. Would you like to have a page that tracks your progression and improvement over time?

image

Key Insights:

  • A significant number of participants expressed interest in tracking their progress.
  • This feature could enhance user engagement and retention.

6. How many Hours do you spend?

image

Key Insights:

  • The data provides insights into user engagement levels, which can be used to tailor the platform's features.

7. Would you recommend this platofrm?

image

Key Insights:

  • High recommendation rates indicate strong user satisfaction.
  • Testimonials can be leveraged for marketing purposes.

Conclusions

Based on the survey, the following key points were identified:

  • Performance: Ensuring reliable uptime is critical.
  • Monetization: There is potential for introducing paid contests, with appropriate pricing strategies.
  • Progress Tracking: Users value features that help track their growth and achievements.
  • Corporate Engagement: Companies are moderately interested in hosting contests, and outreach efforts may improve participation.

Recommendations:

  1. Prioritize platform performance and scalability.
  2. Introduce a tiered pricing model for paid contests.
  3. Develop and promote a progression tracking feature.
  4. Highlight the platform's benefits to organizations for hosting competitions.

Acknowledgments

We thank all the participants for their valuable feedback and insights, which will help improve the platform and create a better experience for all users.