Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Active vs not active #1

Open
JohnMoehrke opened this issue May 15, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Active vs not active #1

JohnMoehrke opened this issue May 15, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@JohnMoehrke
Copy link
Contributor

QEDm should define the use of the status query parameter as mandatory so as to assure that the client is being explicit that they want active, or wants different status. In the absence of the status element the results will very on if only active results are returned or not. For a system that only has active results, it should error when asked to return status other than active.

@JohnMoehrke
Copy link
Contributor Author

this is beyond converting PDF to IG. But it is necessary to assure applications don't get inactive or entered-in-error without realizing they might get those. I recommend adding this

@JohnMoehrke JohnMoehrke added this to the Nov-PC milestone Jul 18, 2024
@JohnMoehrke JohnMoehrke modified the milestones: Nov-PC, Integrate-IPA-PC Nov 22, 2024
@JohnMoehrke
Copy link
Contributor Author

This will be addressed when we integrate with IPA

@JohnMoehrke JohnMoehrke added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant