Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

mCSD Queries and searchParams #157

Open
IrfanH99 opened this issue Sep 5, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

mCSD Queries and searchParams #157

IrfanH99 opened this issue Sep 5, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
CP-worthy Should create a CP to be linked to this issue

Comments

@IrfanH99
Copy link

IrfanH99 commented Sep 5, 2024

Section: In the IHE mCSD iGuide version 3.8.0

Issue: The problem that we have ran into is that ITI-90 and the mCSD Supplier CapabilityStatements often list the full set of parameters, some of which will not be used in all Canadian directories (e.g., some Organization implementers may not support searching on partOf because they don't have advanced hierarchy modelling in place in their current directory or use cases).

In some ways, the R2 Conformance Definition is looser than applying SHALL:able-to-populate, allowing more conditional rules that allow vendors who don't support a given thing to not have to demonstrate it or send it in production. How does the R2 conformance expectation for "support" impact mCSD queries?

Proposed Change: Would like additional guidance on search parameters and/or conformance strengths on said searchParams in the CapabilityStatements.

Priority: Medium/High

@lukeaduncan
Copy link
Contributor

@IrfanH99, are there other searchParameters or elements that are an issue with your use case or is it only Organization.partOf? We're discussing at the face to face this week and trying to find a good solution.

@JohnMoehrke
Copy link
Contributor

assigned CP-ITI-1316

@JohnMoehrke JohnMoehrke added the CP-worthy Should create a CP to be linked to this issue label Nov 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CP-worthy Should create a CP to be linked to this issue
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants