Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Finance and Insurance Services #190

Open
JohnMoehrke opened this issue Nov 15, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Finance and Insurance Services #190

JohnMoehrke opened this issue Nov 15, 2022 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
Dev-L Development effort is Large Review-L Committee Review effort is Large Testing-L Testing Plan Development is Large

Comments

@JohnMoehrke
Copy link
Contributor

JohnMoehrke commented Nov 15, 2022

Due to a lack of interoperability between Point of Service (PoS) systems of health care providers (e.g. Hospital Information Systems) and information systems of health care payers (e.g. Health Financing and Insurance System) there is a lack of automated payment processes for health services.

A PoS needs to communicate at several stages of the health care process with the payer of the service: a) to verify that occurred costs are covered for a patient (and to which extent) and b) claim the incurred costs for a delivered health care service from the payer. Depending on the number of patient visits and the nature of the coverage, this can create high data volumes at all process stages, e.g Nepal ca. 20 thousand hospital claims to the national health insurance per day. Manual entry and transfer of data results in costs for duplicated data entry and errors.

@JohnMoehrke
Copy link
Contributor Author

JohnMoehrke commented Nov 15, 2022

Discussed ITI-Planning November 15, 2022

Recognized lack of experts in ITI on finance and insurance use-cases and solutions.

Actions: John

  • Need to outreach to find more that might be interested. Use existing mailing lists,
  • create a new topic-specific-mailing list to gather these interested parties.
  • reach out to HL7 Finance workgroup, and their projects

@JohnMoehrke JohnMoehrke added Testing-XL Testing Plan Development is Extra-Large Dev-XL Development effort is Extra-Large Review-XL Committee Review effort is Extra-Large labels Nov 15, 2022
@lukeaduncan lukeaduncan self-assigned this Feb 9, 2024
@lukeaduncan lukeaduncan added Review-L Committee Review effort is Large Dev-L Development effort is Large Testing-L Testing Plan Development is Large and removed Testing-XL Testing Plan Development is Extra-Large Dev-XL Development effort is Extra-Large Review-XL Committee Review effort is Extra-Large labels Feb 9, 2024
@lukeaduncan
Copy link
Contributor

@lukeaduncan lukeaduncan moved this to In development by Tech in ITI Project Planning Jul 16, 2024
@lukeaduncan lukeaduncan moved this from In development by Tech to Public Comment in ITI Project Planning Jul 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Dev-L Development effort is Large Review-L Committee Review effort is Large Testing-L Testing Plan Development is Large
Projects
Status: Published (e.g. Trial Implementation)
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants