ASCIIDoc content required not clear for core model element descriptions

[PaulMartinsen]

Section Number

"Table 1:A.4.1-1. SDPi Requirement - Core Model Element Descriptions" and "Table 1:A.4.2-1. SDPi Requirement - Core Model Element Descriptions"

Priority

• Low: Typo or other minor classification that an editor can manage. Requires no group discussion.

Issue

Several terms and attributes appear in both tables with different attributes for the ASCIIDoc. For example a use case is both a core model element (sdpi_requirement_use_case) and a requirement type (sdpi_req_type=use_case_feature). It is not clear what the ASCIIDoc context should be. Other model elements affected include: sdpi_requirement_use_case, sdpi_requirement_ref_standard, sdpi_requirement_ses, sdpi_requirement_tech_feature.

Proposed Change

I don't understand this enough to suggest a solution, unfortunately.

[ToddCooper]

SDPi Friday 2024.12.06 Review -
Discussion to update detail as indicated in this issue.