Replies: 1 comment
-
Did you Check out #43 and #44? Is anyone looking AT them? @ounsworth you asked for them: Are they (or just one of them) OK for you? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Good morning.
Should the Falcon OIDs be updated to the latest OIDs?
1.3.9999.3.1 -> 1.3.9999.3.6
1.3.9999.3.4 -> 1.3.9999.3.9
From this link, it looks like they were updated to .6 and .9 respectively:
https://github.com/open-quantum-safe/openssl/blob/OQS-OpenSSL_1_1_1-stable/include/openssl/obj_mac.h
#define SN_falcon512 "falcon512"
#define LN_falcon512 "falcon512"
#define NID_falcon512 1247
#define OBJ_falcon512 1L,3L,9999L,3L,6L
#define SN_falcon1024 "falcon1024"
#define LN_falcon1024 "falcon1024"
#define NID_falcon1024 1250
#define OBJ_falcon1024 1L,3L,9999L,3L,9L
Kyber:
Are you planning on adding the Kyber OIDs based on this draft?
From: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-uni-qsckeys-00.html#name-kyber
1.3.6.1.4.1.2.267.8.2.2 (kyber-512-r3)
1.3.6.1.4.1.2.267.8.3.3 (kyber-768-r3) (noted as '1.3.6.1.4.1.2.267.8.3' on website; probably a typo).
1.3.6.1.4.1.2.267.8.4.4 (kyber-1024-r3)
1.3.6.1.4.1.2.267.10.2.2 (kyber-512-90s-r3)
1.3.6.1.4.1.2.267.10.3.3 (kyber-768-90s-r3)
1.3.6.1.4.1.2.267.10.4.4 (kyber-1024-90s-r3)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions