Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Packet analysis error with libvvdec #590

Open
AmirMahmood opened this issue Sep 15, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Packet analysis error with libvvdec #590

AmirMahmood opened this issue Sep 15, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@AmirMahmood
Copy link

Hi. There are many problems with VVC in YUView.
My OS is windows 11 and i use MinGW compiler.
I am using YUView-2.14 and vvdec-2.3.0.
vvdec was compiled as a shared lib with -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=1 flag.
But in packet analyzer there are many errors in NAL units parsing.

And the options for showing Slice Index, Motion vectors and ... are not available.

Is there any solution? thanks.

Capture

Screenshot 2024-09-16 021743

@ChristianFeldmann
Copy link
Member

Hi! Thx for the report.
For the parsing errors, could you make the affected bitstream available to me? This could very well be that there are some bugs for special cases in the parsing code.
Unfortunately, the vvdec decoder does not support the exposing of data like partitions, motion vector etc. This could definitely be added though.

@AmirMahmood
Copy link
Author

AmirMahmood commented Sep 24, 2024

Hi! Thx for the report. For the parsing errors, could you make the affected bitstream available to me? This could very well be that there are some bugs for special cases in the parsing code. Unfortunately, the vvdec decoder does not support the exposing of data like partitions, motion vector etc. This could definitely be added though.

OfCourse. this is my bitstream:
20240906164010_BasketballDrillText_832x480_50.zip

does libVTM support the exposing of data like partitions and motion vectors?

@ChristianFeldmann
Copy link
Member

Thx for the file. No unfortunately the libVTM decoder also does not have this. It is straightfoward to add though :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants