You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Maybe we should have a per-target score table somewhere. One column per target and then the rows are compilation time, run-time performance, native interop, debugging support and maybe more.
Like a feature matrix with checkmarks like (here)[https://haxe.org/foundation/support-plans.html] where 3 checkmarks = very good, no checkmarks = bad
So python would be in the bad group, then eval + PHP in the next one, then C# and HL and JVM and Node, then C++ and Java. Neko isn't working, it's probably in the bad group too.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Maybe we should have a per-target score table somewhere. One column per target and then the rows are compilation time, run-time performance, native interop, debugging support and maybe more.
Like a feature matrix with checkmarks like (here)[https://haxe.org/foundation/support-plans.html] where 3 checkmarks = very good, no checkmarks = bad
We could take performance rates from the first graph at https://benchs.haxe.org/formatter-noio/
So python would be in the bad group, then eval + PHP in the next one, then C# and HL and JVM and Node, then C++ and Java. Neko isn't working, it's probably in the bad group too.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: