Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

List of things to do #44

Open
22 tasks
ndattani opened this issue Sep 21, 2019 · 0 comments
Open
22 tasks

List of things to do #44

ndattani opened this issue Sep 21, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@ndattani
Copy link
Member

ndattani commented Sep 21, 2019

  • Do we have Eq. 4 and Proposition 1 and 2 of https://personal.lse.ac.uk/anthony/Quadratization_web.pdf in the book? Also same paper says " to quadratize in polynomial time any pseudo-Boolean function while only using O(n|F|) auxiliary variables" -- do we have that? Also check Remark 1 (Bucheim and Rinaldi)
  • Example on opening page, b1b2 comes up twice: b1b2 - 4b1b2 = -3b1b2
  • -4b1b2b3 -> -4(b1b2 + b1b3), is something like that possible? Think about example on Pg 1 more. Eq. 2 can be transformed from Eq. 1 very easily, how general can we do that?
  • "approximate ELCs" which Andreas found to be like my "heuristic gadgets"
  • change font of Pauli matrices. (not sure what I meant there, and don't have time to check what time that was written and compare it to when the last font change was made, but now in January 2021 I think perhaps the goal was to straighten up the letters so they take up less space? This is after they were already switched from "math font" to a straighter font, but they're still a bit tilted)
  • example on page 1 for quantum case only has coefficients of 1. Some negatives and non-1 numbers would be nice.
  • quantum example preserves entire spectrum, but I don't want people to think right from page 1 that the entire spectrum needs to be preserved. Perhaps an example that only preserves the round state would be better pedagogically.
  • deduc-reduc. Con: only preserves ground state (and degeneracy?). Can we generalize it to a full-spectrum version?
  • split-reduc: "At this point, we could split H0 again, ...." think about what this sentence means.
  • NTR-ABCG: see comments in .tex.
  • NTR-AC: example and alternative forms don't look right.
  • NTR-RBL: alternative form is quartic not cubic? Also I have a note saying "Eq. 10. i+2 = j" for the bibliography section.
  • PTR-RBL-(3->2): alternative form is quartic but should just be expanded version of 74. Eq. 74 shoudl be Eq. 11 of RBL i+2=j which is apparently not the case.
  • PTR-RBL-(4->2): apprently Eq. 11, i+2 < j, whatever that means (this is just what it says in my rough notes). Example has -z1z2z3z4 but it should be positive.
  • Follow PENCIL NOTES in Nike's printed version, for FGBZ.
  • Describe strategies for choosing coeffs in pairwise covers and Rosenberg
  • Add Rosenberg-like method from Gruber's thesis.
  • KKR(3->2) needs bibliography section!
  • added Alavi's paper but he told me it was an old idea so the original papers should also be added.
  • Figure out what was meant by "Can reduce the connectivity of an objective function, as it breaks interactions between variables." for FGBZ
  • 2017 ABCG paper appears twice in bibliography (probably one of them was meant to be a 2015 arXiv or something? ) figure out why and make sure all references to these are not erroneous.
  • Add https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0103170
ndattani added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 23, 2019
… Polished these pages but they still need work, as outlined in the Issue #44.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant