Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Bottom two leaves of Fig. 1 in Split-reduc paper are wrong (thanks to Andreas Soteriou for pointing this out) #33

Open
ndattani opened this issue Mar 27, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

Bottom two leaves of Fig. 1 in Split-reduc paper are wrong (thanks to Andreas Soteriou for pointing this out) #33

ndattani opened this issue Mar 27, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@ndattani
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@ndattani
Copy link
Member Author

ndattani commented Jan 6, 2021

Also, that Figure isn't the best example, since all 3 final functions have minimum = 1, meaning we don't get to show the working of min(a,b,c) for final three functions a,b,c. Also one of a,b,c is still cubic!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@ndattani